All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The failure of the GMC panel to give adequate reasons, and in some cases the reaching of wrong conclusions, resulted in the Court quashing the decision to erase the Claimant from the medical register.
07 March 2012
(1) The Claimant, Professor Walker-Smith, challenged the General Medical Council (GMC) panel's conclusion finding that he had been guilty of serious professional misconduct during a clinical investigation, and as a result of this, his name should be removed from the medical register. The Claimant's case was that the investigations were clinically sound and did not amount to professional misconduct.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...