All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
There was no public interest in disclosing the details of a doctor’s medical condition as part of a voluntary erasure application before the General Medical Council’s Fitness to Practise panel. In deciding otherwise, the panel had thereby erred in law.
9 December 2011
(i) X, a surgeon, sought to challenge by way of judicial review the decision of the General Medical Council’s Fitness to Practise panel to hear in public his application for erasure from the register on the basis of his ill-health. Fitness to practise proceedings had been initiated against X on the basis that his fitness to practise might have been impaired due to ill health and misconduct.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...