R (Waxman) v Crown Prosecution Service  EWHC 133 (Admin)
Procedure – Article 6 – civil proceedings – harassment – prosecutions – restraining orders – Article 8 – Human Rights Act 1998 damages
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Al Rawi v Security Service  UKHRR 728, a closed evidence procedure adopted by a judge without statutory authority was unlawful.
2 February 2012
(i) Mr Fogel (F) had been convicted of harassing Ms Waxman (W). F was subject of a restraining order. F had twice sought to bring civil proceedings against W for which the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had charged F as a breach of the restraining order. However, the CPS did not prosecute F as it concluded that the order did not prevent the right to bring civil proceedings.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.