LexisLibrary and LexisPSL
Sign up for a free trial today and get full access for a weekTrial
The Secretary of State's conclusions as to the compliance of the Claimant with reporting duties were found to be neither irrational nor arbitrary.
15 June 2012
Thirlwell J (extempore judgment)
(1) The Claimant, a college in East London, was granted a tier 4 sponsor licence in 2009. In March 2011, the Claimant applied, and was refused, highly trusted sponsor status (HTS). The refusal was based upon two reasons. The first was that the Claimant did not have practices in place to ensure that only genuine students were issued with confirmation of acceptance for studies (CAS). The second was that the Defendant was not satisfied that the Claimant would comply with its reporting duties.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.