All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Defendant could not reasonably conclude that the Claimant's evidence would not realistically be accepted. The decision to reject the Claimant's representations as a fresh claim was thus rejected.
30 April 2012
(1) The Claimant challenged two decisions of the Defendant not to accept his representations as giving rise to a fresh claim for asylum in accordance with para 353 of the Immigration Rules. The Claimant, an Iraqi national, made an asylum and human rights claim on 4 August 2006. The Claimant alleged that he would be mistreated if he was returned to Iraq due to his Christian faith and perceived sympathy with the UK.
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...