All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Defendant's consideration of subjective statements, its failure to act in accordance with guidance, the non-disclosure of information upon which it relied and the decision being made by a non-objective decision-maker resulted in the decision being found irrational and unreasonable.
1 June 2012
HHJ Thornton QC
(1) The Claimant, Ms Hadis Balakoohi, challenged the decision of the Defendant refusing her indefinite leave to remain. Her application had been made on the basis of domestic violence causing the end of her marriage.
(2) The challenge was made on the basis that that the decision was unlawful, irrational and procedurally unfair. The following grounds were raised
(a) The Defendant failed to take into account relevant documents, and had made its decision relying upon documents obtained without giving the Claimant an opportunity to comment on them.
(b) The decisions had been made without following the guidance in relation to domestic violence.
(c) The particular decision-maker involved had made previous refusal decisions, and as such could not be objective.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Full text reports of cases on all aspects of licensing law and practice.