All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Claimant's detention became unlawful upon there being no prospect of his removal within a reasonable period. Prior to this point, the failure to apply a policy as to the detention of persons with mental health issues did not result in substantial damages being available, because he could otherwise have been lawfully detained.
27 June 2012
(1) The Claimant, Mr Ruhul Anam a Bangladesh national, challenged his immigration detention. The Claimant had been detained in April 2008, and had remained in detention since. The Claimant brought proceedings 3 years earlier based upon:
(a) A breach of the Hardial Singh principles (R v Governor of Durham Prison ex parte Hardial Singh  1 WLR 704);
(b) A failure to comply with a published mental health policy; and
(c) A breach of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Full text reports of cases on all aspects of licensing law and practice.