All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Claimant no longer posed sufficient risk of absconding that his continued detention could be justified. Previous delays regarding his removal did not render his detention at that time unlawful.
9 May 2012
(1) The Claimant, Mr Akram a Pakistani national, entered the UK in December 2000 and claimed asylum. Following a conviction for grievous bodily harm, he absconded and was sentenced to four years imprisonment and a deportation recommendation was made. Following the expiry of his sentence, the Claimant's detention was maintained pursuant to para.2(3) of Schedule 3 of the Immigration Act 1971 and a deportation order was made.
(2) During his detention, the UK Borders Agency had made efforts to arrange his deportation. However, difficulties were encountered as he had no travel or identity documents, and the Pakistani authorities were unwilling to provide these without adequate information to verify his identity.
(3) The Claimant, by these proceedings, sought a declaration that his detention has been unlawful, and that his rights under article 5 of the European Convention of Human Rights were breached.
To read the full story, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...