All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
22 June 2011
Lord Phillips; Lord Hope; Lord Rodger; Lady Hale; Lord Brown; Lord Clarke; Lord Dyson
Permission for judicial review in the High Court of an unappealable decision of the Upper Tribunal would only be given if there was an important point of principle or some other compelling reason to grant permission.
R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal  EWCA Civ 859; R (MR (Pakistan)) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber)  EWHC 3558 (Admin)
(1) Mr Cart (C) and Mr Rana (MR) appealed decisions which had dismissed their applications for judicial review of refusals of permission to appeal by the Upper Tribunal. In C’s case, both the Divisional Court ( EWHC 3052 (Admin)) and Court of Appeal ( EWCA Civ 859) had held decisions of the Upper Tribunal could only be subject to judicial review in strictly limited circumstances. The Court of Appeal held that these circumstances were outright excess of jurisdiction or the denial of procedural justice. In MR’s case, the High Court dismissed the case on the basis of the Court of Appeal’s decision in C’s case but certified MR’s case as appropriate for a leap-frog appeal.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Full text reports of cases on all aspects of licensing law and practice.