All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
27 July 2011
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Wilson LJ; Smith LJ; Mummery LJ
The Court of Appeal provided guidance on the objective element of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights when considering whether there is a deprivation of liberty. In the instant case, there was no deprivation of liberty.
On appeal from:
Re MIG & MEG  EWHC 785 (Fam) (Parker J)
Summary of judgment
(1) P and Q appealed against the decision of Parker J to refuse to grant a declaration that their care arrangements amounted to a deprivation of liberty for the purposes of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. P and Q were sisters who had previously been exposed to a dysfunctional and abusive family life which had included excessive physical chastisement, neglect and deprivation. They were removed from the home and were now in the care of Surrey County Council.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Full text reports of cases on all aspects of licensing law and practice.