All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
Imposition of a sanction interfering with the clinical practice of the Claimant without providing reasons justifying such a sanction rendered the sanction unreasonable.
7 February 2012
(i) The Appellant, a clinical therapist employee of the Royal Welsh College of Arts and Drama, challenged a decision made by the Panel of the Conduct and Competence Committee which concluded that she had committed acts of misconduct, and/or displayed a lack of competence. The Appellant challenged the refusal of the panel to consider expert evidence that she had adduced. The Appellant also submitted that the panel was wrong to conclude that her fitness to practice was impaired at the time of the decision.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.