LexisLibrary and LexisPSL
Sign up for a free trial today and get full access for a weekTrial
Minimal disruption under Article 8 does not justify non-removal of an individual from the United Kingdom.
29 July 2011
(1) The Claimants were both overstayers, having entered the United Kingdom legally. Each married after their leave had expired and each made an application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as the spouse of, respectively, a British citizen and, a Bangladeshi national with indefinite leave to remain. Both applications to remain were refused by the Secretary of State. As neither Claimant had leave to be in the United Kingdom at the time the applications were made, there was no right of appeal. The procedure open to both was therefore to leave the United Kingdom and make an application for an entry clearance on the same basis from abroad.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
Keeping you up to date with the latest developments in education law.