This title is available as part of LexisLibraryFind out more or request a trial
The Defendant had erred in certifying the Claimant’s case as clearly unfounded when it had failed to consider the individual circumstances as opposed to the general picture.
19 December 2011
Stephen Davis HHJ
(i) The Claimant sought to challenge the Defendant’s decision to certify her asylum and human rights claim as clearly unfounded, the effect of which was to deprive her of an in-country right of appeal against the rejection of her claim.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.