All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
Unlawful refusal of asylum and subsequent detention rendered the Claimant eligible for damages.
24 November 2011
(i) The Claimant, from Afghanistan, was the subject of an age assessment by Wilshire Social Services which concluded he was 18. The age assessment was relied upon in refusing asylum to the Claimant. He was detained pending removal. It is now accepted that the Claimant is 16 ½ and had been granted discretionary leave to remain. This claim is essentially a claim for damages. Three questions thus remain.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
Keeping you up to date with the latest developments in education law.