Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Public law and Regulation

Case reports and guidance on public law and professional regulation issues

01 FEB 2012

Grant v The Ministry of Justice [2011] EWHC 3379 (QB)

Prisons – “slopping out” – human rights – Article 3 – minimum severity – standard of proof – Article 8

The practice of “slopping out” at a prison did not violate prisoners’ rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR. 
19 December 2011
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
Hickinbottom J
(i) Two prisoners, Mr Grant and Mr Gleaves (G), sought declarations that the practice of “slopping out” violated their rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). As prisoners, they were contained in their cells for about 13 hours every night. As there were no toilet facilities in the cells, G did not have free access to a toilet during this period. There was an electronic locking system in place that allowed one prisoner at a time to access toilet facilities. If a prisoner was unable to access the toilet facilities, a bucket was provided. The bucket may be emptied or “slopped out” into a sluice. G sought declarations against this process.

To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).

Education Law Reports

Education Law Reports

Comprehensive and reliable reporting service.

More Info from £155.00
Available in Education Law Online
Education Law Journal

Education Law Journal

Keeping you up to date with the latest developments in education law.

Available in Education Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters