All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
It was not necessary for the General Dental Council to seek a declaration from the court that it could pass patient information to its investigation committee and its fitness to practice panel, even where the patients had not consented to such a use.
28 November 2011
(i) The General Dental Council (GDC) sought a declaration that it could pass patient information to its investigation committee. An insurance company (C) had told the GDC that it suspected that claims by a number of patients in relation to a single dentist (D) were made fraudulently. C passed the relevant patient records to the GDC in varying forms of anonymity. The GDC requested consent from the patients involved but most refused whilst some did not respond. D objected to the GDC’s proposed passing of the patient’s information to the GDC’s investigation committee.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...