Cardao-Pito, R (on the application of) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education & Anor  EWHC 203
Education – Duty to give reasons – Appeals – Compensation
The failure to provide adequate reasoning in a decision made by the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education resulted in the decision being quashed and remitted.
16 February 2012
HHJ Gilbart QC
(i) This application concerned a complaint made by the Claimant, a Portuguese national, to the Defendant, the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (‘OIA’). The Claimant made his complaint after he was asked to leave the London Business School (‘LBS’), where he had been enrolled from September 2007 on a four year course.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Full text reports of cases on all aspects of licensing law and practice.