All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Defendant’s decision to terminate a contract for a care home was neither Wednesbury unreasonable nor disproportionate. The Claimant care home was not a victim in accordance with Article 8 ECHR.
19 January 2012
HHJ Llewellyn QC
(i) The Claimant, the owner and operator of Hillside Care Centre, sought permission to challenge the decision of the Defendant, dated 12 December 2011, to terminate its contract to provide care for elderly dementia sufferers. The Claimant further argued that termination of the contract was, in effect, a decision to close the home. The Claimant submitted that
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
Keeping you up to date with the latest developments in education law.