All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
The Defendant was entitled to conclude that it was not unreasonable to require the Claimant to return to Pakistan. The Defendant's failure to consider its obligation under section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 was not a sufficient basis on which to quash the Defendant's decision.
31 May 2012
(1) The Claimant, a Pakistani national, sought to challenge the Defendant's decision of 28 March 2012 to refuse him leave to remain. In support of his application, representations were made that the Claimant held a significant role in his community at a Reading Islamic Centre.
(2) It was contended that:
(a) The Defendant's decision was unlawful due to the decision maker failing to consider section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 which required the Defendant to have regard to the need to "safeguard and promote the welfare of children in the United Kingdom" when making her decision.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to Jordans Public Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select Jordans Public Law online from the drop down menu.
An authoritative source of case reports covering every aspect of immigration, asylum and...