Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

International Family Law

The leading authority on international family law

05 MAR 2014

The pitfalls of lis pendens in transnational matrimonial jurisdiction disputes before English courts

Brussels II bis applies the lis pendens and habitual residence rules in an inflexible manner that gives rise to injustices and in many cases harms the children's best interests. Torpedo suits are intended to frustrate ongoing family ADR procedures as well as criminal investigations against a parent or spouse for offences related to parental responsibility and the marital relationship. Where petitions involve actions for divorce and parental responsibility the courts do not first seek to ascertain the habitual residence of the children. In practice, English courts focus on the habitual residence of the respondent parent as a means of enforcing the lis pendens rule. Justice requires that judges assume a more active role by applying discretional stays in favour of glaringly appropriate jurisdictions. Brussels II bis should not be construed contrary to fundamental principles of justice.

By Ilias Bantekas, Professor of International Law, Brunel University School of Law

The full version of this article appears in the March 2014 issue of International Family Law. 

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
International Family Law Practice, The

International Family Law Practice, The


Provides comprehensive coverage of the international elements of English family law

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters