All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in S (A Child), reversing the Court of Appeal's order that the mother immediately return the two year old child (W) to Australia. In doing so, the Supreme Court gave further consideration to Article 13(b) of the 1980 Hague Convention and its decision in Re E.
Having dealt with Article 13(b) only nine months before, the Supreme Court were clearly surprised in S (a Child) to be dealing with essentially the same issues again so soon and robustly criticised the Court of Appeal's judgment for (amongst other things) failing to apply Re E correctly and for applying a fresh gloss on the meaning of Article 13(b).
To read the full article, you must subscribe to International Children Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select International Children Law online from the drop down menu.
The practice title for family lawyers engaged in/dealing with issues European and worldwide