A v T  FD11P02388
Abduction - Article 13(a) consent and acquiescence defences - Whether consensual, temporary removal automatically suspends earlier consent to permanent removal
9 December 2011
2 children (4 ½ and 2) born in Sweden. Father ("F") was Swedish. Mother ("M") was British. M removed the children to England in June 2011 with the consent of F for a temporary period of time. At end July 2011, M decided she wanted to remain in England with the children on a permanent basis. F sought the return of the children to Sweden under Hague Convention 1980 / Brussels II Revised Regulation 2003 on the basis that he had not agreed to the children remaining permanently in England when the M left with the children in June 2011. M's defended the proceedings on the basis of an article 13(a) consent and article 13(a) acquiescence defence.
To read the full case summary and to view the case transcript, you must subscribe to International Children Law Online (if you already subscribe click here to log in).
To request a free trial click here and select International Children Law online from the drop down menu.
Pre-order the 2017 edition today