All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
F, an Irish property developer, had been made bankrupt on his own petition in this jurisdiction. A secured creditor, M had successfully obtained an annulled and/or rescission as F had failed to disclose that there were parallel bankruptcy proceedings on foot in the Ireland. The order was to be effective pending determination of the issue of F's COMI. F's trustee in bankruptcy sought a review of the annulment/rescission order. Proudman J refused the application. F's non-disclosures had justified the annulment/rescission. While the trustee had been notifies of the annulment/rescission hearing, and had only decided to attend part way through. That did not amount to sufficient ground to invoke the court's wide discretion to review, vary or rescind any order pursuant to s 375 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
"This is the ultimate statement of where the law on IVAs is to be found in our great common law...