Jones v Kernott  UKSC 53 – Joint ownership, cohabitants and imputed intentions
With much fanfare in the national press the Supreme Court has finally delivered its much anticipated judgment in Jones v Kernott some 6 months after the appeal was argued. Some hopelessly optimistic commentators had suggested that the Supreme Court would take the opportunity to change the landscape for unmarried cohabitants and fill the void that has been left by the government’s failure to implement the Law Commission’s proposals for reform (indeed, last month the government confirmed that it would not implement those proposals). Others had harboured the hope that clarity would be provided by addressing the inconsistencies and uncertainties generated by a vast body of often conflicting Court of Appeal decisions and four inconsistent House of Lords’ pronouncements (ie Pettitt v Pettitt  AC 777, Gissing v Gissing  AC 886, Lloyds Bank v Rosset  1 AC 107 and Stack v Dowden  UKHL 17,  BPIR 913). Arguably Jones v Kernott fails to deliver. The headline in The Times report on 10 November 2011 wasn’t far short of the mark: ‘Unmarried couples “need clarity” after Supreme Court rules on house ownership’.
To view the full text, please log in.
To receive a FREE 14 day online trial to Insolvency Law Online click here.
"BPIR is an excellent series, of interest to both corporate and personal insolvency lawyers,...