All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
FS purchased a property with a mortgage from Mortgage Express. The property was split in two, between the lower flat (Flat 1 or Flat A) and the upper flat (Flat 2 or Flat B). FS then obtained a loan from BoS apparently to purchase the upper flat. Shortly thereafter, he obtained another loan from BoS apparently to purchase the lower flat. Such loans were obtained by misrepresentation. A charge was effected over the upper flat, citing the title number of the property, which was registered. The Mortgage Express mortgage was discharged using the proceeds of the loans. A lease was granted of the lower flat, using a new title number, and the BoS charge was mistakenly discharged. After a bankruptcy order was made against FS, BoS entered a unilateral notice against the property on the basis of the erroneous discharge. The trustee in bankruptcy's application to remove it was dismissed. Norris J dismissed the trustee's appeal. The BoS charge was an equitable charge of the upper flat (although by registration BoS had acquired a legal charge over the property). But the discharge of that charge was a mistake, either legally or factually, so that the discharge could be rescinded and the register rectified.
"This is the ultimate statement of where the law on IVAs is to be found in our great common law...