Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

  • Family Law Reports
Thumb confirmation email image

Have You Tried Family Law Online?

Have all of your Family Law resources at your fingertips.

Find Out More

Family Law Reports

£474.00

"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas of family law."

Frank Feehan QC, Head of Chambers 42 Bedford Row

Paperback i

Book printed softcover

£474.00
Other relevant online products

* Call 0117 917 5100 to find out more about online services

We are the leading specialist  family court reporting service.
Family Law Reports
contains verbatim reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law. Family Law Reports are available as both a print and online subscription.


Family Law Reports provides the following key features:

  • Unequalled coverage of all important cases, issued 24 times a year
  • Every case judicially approved making them totally authoritative and reliable
  • Headnotes prepared by family law experts providing insightful summaries of the main issues and points of law raised
  • Comprehensively indexed and tabled by subject matter, cases reported and referred to, statutes, statutory instruments, international conventions and European and non-UK legislation
If you would like a free sample issue click here and send us your name, address and contact telephone number.

[2017] 1 FLR 487- 634 Issue 4

  • Re C (Children: Power to Choose Forenames)
    [2016] EWCA Civ 374 [2017] 1 FLR 487, CA
  • DM and Another v SJ and Others (Surrogacy: Parental Order)
    [2016] EWHC 270 (Fam) [2017] 1 FLR 514, FD
  • Ismail v Choudhry
    [2016] EWCA Civ 17 [2017] 1 FLR 522, CA
  • Re K (Contact)
    [2016] EWCA Civ 99 [2017] 1 FLR 530, CA
  • K v K (Financial Remedy: Final Order Prior to Decree Nisi)
    [2016] EWFC 23 [2017] 1 FLR 541, FC
  • Re M (Care Proceedings: Adoption Support)
    [2016] EWCA Civ 61 [2017] 1 FLR 548, CA
  • Mann v Mann
    [2016] EWHC 314 (Fam) [2017] 1 FLR 559, FD
  • R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice
    [2016] EWCA Civ 91 [2017] 1 FLR 615, CA
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas of family law."

Frank Feehan QC, Head of Chambers, 42 Bedford Row

Rebecca Bailey-Harris Barrister, 1 Hare Court; Professor Emeritus, University of Bristol

Caroline Bridge Barrister and Solicitor, High Court of New Zealand; Honorary Fellow, University of Manchester

Nigel Lowe Barrister; Professor of Law, Cardiff Law School, Cardiff University

Consultant Editor: The Honourable Mr Justice Cobb
C v M
CASE C-376/14 PPU
Courtof Justice of the European Union
MIlešicˇ, President of The Chamber; AÓ Caoimh; C Toader;
EJarašiu¯nas (Rapporteur); CG Fernlund, Judges; M Szpunar;
LHewlett; Principal Administrator
9 October 2014


Jurisdiction – Habitual residence – Reference for preliminary ruling – Mother
and child relocated to Ireland followingFrench order granting mother permission to do so – Order subsequently appealed – Whether the French court retained jurisdiction pursuant to BIIR– Whetherthe child was being wrongfully retained – Whether the child could establish habitualresidence in Ireland The British mother and French father marriedand had a child in France in 2008. When the marriage broke down the French courtgranted the parents joint parental authority, determined the child’s habitual residence tobe with the mother and made provision for contact between the father and child. Thejudgment which was provisionally enforceable provided that the mother waspermitted to set up residence in Ireland if she wished. The father sought to appeal but astay of the order was refused. The mother and child travelled to Ireland where they hadnow been living for 2 years. Nine months after their relocation, the father’s appealwas allowed and the original French judgment was overturned. The court ordered that the childshould live with the father and made provision for contact with the mother. Thefather applied to the High Court of Ireland for recognition and enforcement of the Frenchorder. The application was successful but the mother sought to appeal on a point oflaw. The father also applied to the High Court for a return order pursuant to theHague Convention for a return of the child to France and for a declaration that the motherhad wrongfully retained the child in Ireland. The application was dismissed andthe court held that the removal of the child to Ireland was lawful since it took place onthe basis of the French judgment. The High Court held that the child’s habitualresidence was not conditional upon the French judgment permitting the child’sremoval being overturned on appeal and that the child had been habitually resident inIreland since the mother took her there with the intention of settling. The fatherappealed. The Supreme Court of Ireland stayed the proceedings and made a reference for apreliminary ruling to the CJEU in seeking to establish whether the French court retainedjurisdiction in matters relating to the child in light of Art 12(2)(b) or Art 12(3)(a) and(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003Concerning Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments inMatrimonial Matters and in Matters of Parental Responsibility, repealing Regulation(EC) No 1347/2000 (Brussels II Revised) (BIIR) or whether the mother andchild were entitled to establish their habitual residence in Ireland. The courtasked: (1) Did the existence of the French proceedings relating to the custody of thechild preclude, in the circumstances of this case, the establishment of habitual residenceof the child in Ireland? (2) Did either the father or the French courts continue tomaintain custody rights in relation to the child so as to render wrongful the retention of thechild in Ireland? (3) Were the Irish courts entitled to consider the question of habitualresidence of the child in the circumstances where she had resided in Ireland for 2 yearsand her removal to Ireland was not in breach of French law?

Read the full case report


2017 Print Subscription Information
£474.00 + p&p
ISSN 0261-4375 
24 issues per year
Those wishing to receive Family Law Reports Part 1 and Part 2 bound volumes, plus a half year index should contact customer service on 0330 161 1234.

A full archive is also available to purchase, please call our account management team today on 0845 3701234 (calls cost 7p/min) and lines are open Monday to Friday 8:00 to 17:30 hrs, or email customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk.

Have a question about this product? Please get in touch by completing the boxes below.

You May Also Like

Child and Family Law Quarterly

Child and Family Law Quarterly

"The final professional word for the practitioner in family and child law" Phillip Taylor MBE...

Available in Family Law Online
Family Law

Family Law

journal

"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with contemporary issues" Sir Mark Potter P

More Info from £320.00
Available in Family Law Online

DIY Divorce and Separation

The expert guide to representing yourself

If you are looking to represent yourself in court this book will de-mystify the legal process and...

More Info from £15.99
Subscribe to our newsletters