All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
ANDREW BAINHAM, Fellow of Christ's College Cambridge
In Re B (A Child)  UKSC 5,  1 FLR (forthcoming) the new Supreme Court had its first opportunity to consider the claims of natural parents as against others in disputes over the welfare of a child. In this case the argument concerned the residence of a boy ‘Harry' approaching 4 years old at the time of the Supreme Court's decision. Lord Kerr, delivering the single judgement of the Court, said that the speech of Baroness Hale of Richmond in Re G (Children)  UKHL 43,  2 FLR 629 might have been the final word on the subject but that ‘misunderstandings about the true import of that decision and the applicable principles persist.'
Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement