Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

27 FEB 2008

FINANCIAL RELIEF/COSTS: RH v RH (Costs (Adjustments for Gross Disparity) [2008] EWHC 347

(Family Division; Singer J; 27 February 2008)

In view of the significant disparity between the parties' costs, the judge effectively wrote back into the husband's assets £225,000 of the husband's costs, on the basis that he had overspent. In effect, the husband's ancillary relief award was reduced by £225,000.

An offer made by the husband, but ignored by the wife, ought to have been taken into account, however, it was not just that the wife should pay all the husband's costs from the date of the offer, given that the husband's approach to the litigation had verged on the obsessional. The wife should pay the husband's costs in the fixed sum of £150,000.

Family Law

Family Law


"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with contemporary issues" Sir Mark Potter P

More Info from £320.00
Available in Family Law Online

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

Pre-order the 2017 edition today

More Info from £498.00
Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters