Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

05 MAR 2008

CARE/EVIDENCE: Re S (Expert Evidence)

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe and Hughes LJJ; 5 March 2008)

When instructing experts nothing relevant could be excluded, but equally material that was unnecessary because it was irrelevant had to be rigorously excluded. Experts had to be spared files of documents that were peripheral to their essential task; the cost of experts was unnecessarily inflated by overburdening them with papers of no significance to the task. Local authorities were to abstain from sending experts material that would inevitably be perceived by the person being assessed as unfair in the sense that it was prejudicial. In the instant case the expert could be sent the father's caution for bigamy, and details of prior prosecutions for sexual offences that had resulted in the father's acquittal, but opinions and reported allegations of sexual misconduct that had not been the subject of criminal or family proceedings must be excluded.

Female Genital Mutilation

Female Genital Mutilation

Law and Practice

Covers the law, practice and procedure in respect of FGM and also includes wider contextual...

Cohabitation

Cohabitation

Law, Practice and Precedents

This work provides commentary, checklists, procedural guides and precedents on the subject in a...