Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

10 MAY 2005

CONTEMPT: Re M (Contact Order) [2005] EWCA Civ 615

(Court of Appeal, Ward and Clarke LJJ, 11 April 2005) [2005] 2 FLR 1006

Held that the judge had erred in principle. A custodial sentence should not have been imposed until the judge was satisfied that such was justified. A custodial sentence ought not to be imposed simply because the father lacked the means to pay a fine. See also Re M (Contact Order) [2005] EWCA 615 below in Newswatch cases under the heading Contempt". See September [2005] Fam Law 694 for the case report and comment.

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

Pre-order the 2017 edition today

More Info from £498.00
Available in Family Law Online
Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports

"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas...

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters