LexisLibrary and LexisPSL
Sign up for a free trial today and get full access for a weekTrial
Disputes between parents over routine childhood immunisation raise questions about the justiciability of minor issues of medical treatment and the courts' handling of parental decisions. This commentary on the first instance and Court of Appeal judgments in Re C argues that the construction of welfare frequently deployed in such disputes is a narrow and individualistic one which privileges medical best interests and norms over a wider conception of welfare, and fails to take sufficient account of rights-based arguments.
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...