Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

01 JUL 2016

R (M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 611

R (M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 611
(Court of Appeal, Sir James Munby P, Arden, Burnett LJJ, 30 June 2016)

Medical treatment – HFEA 2008 – Consent – Parents sought to export the eggs of their deceased daughter to the USA for treatment – HFEA Committee refused to approve – Appeal

The parents’ appeal from the HFEA decision not to permit the export of their deceased daughter’s stored gametes for treatment in the USA was allowed.

When she was seriously ill, the daughter consented to treatment for egg removal and storage (including after death), and also to the use of her eggs after death. Following her death her parents claimed that it had been their daughter's wish for her eggs to be used to create an embryo using donor sperm and for it to be implanted into her mother. The parents would raise the child as their grandchild. However, the daughter had not completed any form which detailed that specific use. The parents applied to the HFEA seeking to export the eggs to a fertility clinic in the USA to carry out their daughter's wishes.

Despite the mother giving evidence of conversations between herself and her daughter regarding her daughter's wishes, the Statutory Approvals Committee of the HFEA refused to approve the request on the basis that there was insufficient evidence that the daughter had given consent to the proposed use of her gametes after her death. The parents brought judicial review proceedings, claiming that the decision had been irrational and that the committee had taken into account matters which it should not have.

The judge held that the decision had been lawful and that the committee had been entitled to conclude that there had been no sufficiently clear evidence that the daughter had intended the mother to act as a surrogate after her death.

The parents appealed.

The appeal was allowed, the decision set aside and the case remitted to the committee for reconsideration.

The decision below had been in error insofar as there were: misstatements of material evidence; a failure to provide reasons why the committee had considered that the daughter had to have certain information before she could give effective consent; a failure to decide what relevant information the Act required the daughter to have had.

The conclusion that the daughter had not explicitly expressed a wish for her mother to carry her child after her death flew in the face of the mother's evidence, which had not been rejected. The committee had also concluded that there was no evidence that the daughter had consented to the use of her eggs after her death, which was plainly inconsistent with the form of consent that had been signed.

Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 611
Case No: C1/2015/2189

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
Mr Justice Ouseley CO30772014

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

Date: 30/06/2016


Before:

THE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION
LADY JUSTICE ARDEN
and
LORD JUSTICE BURNETT

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between:

THE QUEEN
On the application of MR AND MRS M
Appellants

- and -

HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY
Respondent

Jenni Richards QC and Rose Grogan (instructed by Natalie Gamble Associates) for the Appellants
Catherine Callaghan (instructed by Blake Morgan) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 25 May 2016

R (On the application of Mr and Mrs M) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2016] EWCA Civ 611

Approved Judgment
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts

Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts

"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer" Solicitors Journal

Available in Family Law Online
Family Law Online

Family Law Online

Get a FREE trial today! The fastest way to access the latest law reports, case law, commentary,...

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters