Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

Court of Protection Practice and Procedure Conference 2016

A comprehensive guide to best practice and current thinking

07 JUL 2015

Prest v Prest [2015] EWCA Civ 714

Prest v Prest [2015] EWCA Civ 714
(Court of Appeal,McFarlane, Gloster LJJ, Blake J, 7 July 2015)

[The judicially approved judgment and accompanying headnote has now published in Family Law Reports [2016] 1 FLR 773]

Financial remedies – Breach of order – Application forjudgment summons – Standard of proof – Whether the 4-week prison sentence wasunacceptable

The full judgment is attached below

The husband's appealfrom a 4-week prison sentence for breach of a financial order was dismissed.

When the husband andwife divorced after 15 years of marriage the wife was awarded a lump sum by wayof property transfer of £17.5m and pending discharge of the lump sum thehusband was to make periodical payments of 2% pa on the amount outstanding.

The wife allegednon-payment of arrears and was granted a judgment summons under s 5 of theDebtors Act 1869. A penalty of 4 weeks’ imprisonment was imposed but wassuspended providing that the husband paid the arrears within 3 months. Thehusband appealed.

Lord Justice McFarlaneadvised treating three key authorities referred to with caution: Zuk v Zuk [2012] EWCA Civ 1871; Bhura v Bhura [2012] EWHC 3633 (Fam);and Mohan v Mohan [2013] EWCA Civ 586.Those authorities suggested that in the criminal process of hearing a judgmentsummons it was sufficient to rely upon findings as to wealth made on the civilstandard of proof in the original proceedings and that those findings coupledwith proof of non-payment was sufficient to establish the burden on therespondent.

In such cases wherethe respondent might serve a term of imprisonment certain requirements had to besatisfied: (a) the fact that the respondent had, since the date of the order orjudgment, the means to pay the sum due must be proved to the criminal standardof proof; (b) the fact that the respondent had refused or neglected, to pay thesum due, must also be proved to the criminal standard; (c) the burden of proofwas at all times on the applicant; and (d) the respondent could not becompelled to give evidence.

The husband’s appeal was dismissed. The decision torefuse an adjournment to further investigate the husband’s ill health was acase management decision which had been approached properly and did not denyhim a fair trial. There was no risk that the judge would take improper accountof previous findings because he had conducted the fact-finding process of thehusband’s findings. In fact the judge did not take account of those findingsand did not apply the incorrect standard of proof. The judgment drew a cleardistinction between the previous findings and those made in the judgmentsummons proceedings. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the wife hadacquiesced or encouraged the husband to pay other outgoings rather than tofulfil his maintenance obligations to her. It had been unacceptable for thehusband to persistently fail to comply with the order. The 4-week prisonsentence was not unacceptable given the outstanding arrears amounted to £320,000.

Case No: B6/2014/2752

Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWCA Civ 714

Mr Justice Moylan

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 07/07/2015



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :


- and -


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mr James Turner QC and Mr Peter Mitchell (instructed by Collyer Bristow LLP) for the Appellant
Mr Jeremy Posnansky QC (of Farrer & Co) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 19th March 2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Prest v Prest 

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts

Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts

"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer" Solicitors Journal

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters