LexisLibrary and LexisPSL
Sign up for a free trial today and get full access for a weekTrial
Nick Wikeley is the John Wilson Chair in Law, School of Law, University of Southampton, UK. Lisa Young is an Associate Professor, School of Law, Murdoch University, Australia.
Novel legal actions seeking damages in deceit for paternity fraud are appearing around the world. Until recently, the only reported decision in England and Wales was P v B (Paternity: Damages for Deceit), in which Stanley Burnton J decided as a preliminary point of jurisdiction that such an action was possible. Australias High Court has now decided its first such case (Magill v Magill). While all of their Honours held that the tort was not made out on the facts of the particular case, they also addressed at length the general question of the applicability of deceit to paternity lies within marriage. A variety of reasons were adopted, with the majority holding that there was no cause of action in deceit in these circumstances. Shortly after that decision, the English High Court handed down judgment in A v B (Damages: Paternity), in which the trial judge followed P v B in preference to Magill v Magill and made an award of damages. This note explores the reasoning of the High Court of Australia and considers its relevance in the context of England and Wales.
For the full article see Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 20, No 1, 2008.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.
The Red Book is the acknowledged authority on practice and procedure