Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

15 FEB 2005

CARE/CONTACT: Merton London Borough Council v K; Re K (Care: Representation: Public Funding) [2005] EWHC 167 (Fam)

(15 February 2005; Baron J; Family Division) [2005] 2 FLR 422

Public funds should not be used to enable parties to be represented unless they had a positive case to be  before the court. If parties were joined (at a late stage) in care cases, their lawyers had a positive duty to set out why they are actually required to be repn court and must inform the Legal Services Commission in writing of the precise reasons why scarce public funds should be made available for trial. It was suggested that the Legal Services Commission draw up a new procedure for public law cases to ensure that only parties with a legitimate need were represented throughout the hearing.

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

More Info from £55.00

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters