Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

10 OCT 2005


(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Latam and Wall LJJ; 26 May 2005) [2005] 2 FLR 1011

Held that three young men aged 17, 15 and 13 should be afforded separate representation. They were educated, articulate and reasonably mature and it would be unthinkable to exclude them from knowledge of and participation in legal proceedings affecting them so fundamentally. The case provides a timely opportunity to recognise the growing acknowledgment of the autonomy and rights of children nationally and internationally. In order to safeguard rights under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989, Art 12 it is necessary to, in the case of articulate teenagers, to accept that the rights to freedom of expression outweigh the paternalistic judgment of welfare. Welfare nevertheless played a part in assessing the sufficiency of a child's understanding.

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

More Info from £55.00
Available in Family Law Online

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

Pre-order the 2017 edition today

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters