Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

02 DEC 2007

ANCILLARY RELIEF: M v M [2006] EWCA Civ 1852

(Court of Appeal; Scott Baker and Wall LJJ; 6 December 2006)

In a case concerning the terms of sale of matrimonial property including land with planning permission, the wife was entitled to refuse the husband's offer to purchase the land, on the grounds that she: was not to receive a 10% deposit; had not been offered an indemnity; and did not trust the husband. The husband's previous litigation misconduct was relevant in this regard. Had the husband behaved properly during the proceedings, had he given full frank and clear disclosure, had he not breached his undertakings and dissipated funds, he could now have argued that it was the wife who was being unreasonable in rejecting his proposals. If ever there was a case that pointed the moral of financial probity in ancillary relief proceedings as important, this was that case.

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

Pre-order the 2017 edition today

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Family Law

Family Law


"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with contemporary issues" Sir Mark Potter P

More Info from £320.00
Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters