This title is available as part of LexisLibraryFind out more or request a trial
(Supreme Court; Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke; 12 May 2010)
The issue was what rules applied to family members seeking entry to the UK where the sponsor had been granted asylum and subsequently obtained British citizenship. Consequently the family reunion policy applicable to recognised refugees did not apply. Whether the asylum rules or general rules applied. The requirement that such family members be accommodated and maintained in the UK without recourse to public funds was an inherent part of the general rules. The family members appealed against ruling that the general rules applied.
Appeal allowed. The relevant rules did not make any reference to whether or not a refugee had been granted citizenship, but referred only to whether they had been granted asylum. The parent who had been granted asylum came within rules, whether or not granted citizenship. The family members under asylum rules did not have to meet maintenance and accommodation requirements imposed by the general rules.
Family Law Reports are relied upon by the judiciary, barristers and solicitors and the reports are cited daily in court and in judgments.
They contain verbatim case reports of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, House of Lords and European courts case, and also includes practice directions, covering the whole range of family law, public and private child law.
This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...