Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

09 NOV 2007

Ignoring necessity: the court's decision to impose an ASBO on a child

Tim Bateman, Senior Policy Development Officer at Nacro and Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Bedfordshire. The anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) has garnered more than its fair share of headlines since provision for the measure was first made in section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Drawing on recent research on the use of ASBOs against children, this article aims to explore some of the factors that determine whether an application against a young person below the age of 18 years is granted. It is argued that while courts generally require strong evidence to establish the young person's involvement in anti-social behaviour, less attention is paid to the issue of whether an ASBO is necessary to prevent further incidence of misconduct. It is further contended that necessity is overlooked, in part, because magistrates and district judges (and defence solicitors) tend to assume, sometimes erroneously, that applications for ASBOs against children are only initiated where other measures have been tried and failed. For the full article see Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 19, No 3, 2007.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Financial Remedies Handbook

Financial Remedies Handbook

Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...

Available in Lexis®Library
Female Genital Mutilation

Female Genital Mutilation

Law and Practice

Covers the law, practice and procedure in respect of FGM and also includes wider contextual...