Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

19 SEP 2011

Hyde v Hyde: defining or defending marriage? [2007] CFLQ 322

Rebecca Probert

Professor

Lord Penzance's description of marriage in Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee has often been cited as the legal definition of marriage, and has been relied on to deny marital status to a number of unions, most recently in Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Yet his words were shaped by their historical context and were not immediately regarded as defining marriage. Nor have they been taken literally in all contexts: when considering the availability of divorce, the courts have not insisted that a marriage be ‘for life', nor has recognition been denied to ‘non-Christian' marriages. This article argues that Lord Penzance's description should be understood as a defence, rather than as a definition, of marriage, and that modern judges are not constrained by it, and should not continue to invoke it.

Family Court Practice, The

(Red Book)

The Red Book is the acknowledged authority on practice and procedure

More Info from £498.00
Available in Family Law Online
Cohabitation

Cohabitation

Law, Practice and Precedents

This work provides commentary, checklists, procedural guides and precedents on the subject in a...

Subscribe to our newsletters