Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

05 FEB 2010

How Not to be Liable for Damages to your Client's Spouse: White v Withers and Hildebrand

CHRISTOPHER HAMES, Barrister, 4 Paper Buildings, Temple

The decision of the Court of Appeal in White v Withers and Another [2009] EWCA Civ 1122, raises the spectre of family practitioners being found liable for damages in tort where their client, purportedly complying with the rules set out in Hildebrand v Hildebrand [1992] 1 FLR 244 and T v T (Interception of Documents) 1994 2 FLR 1083 has removed documents - either in paper or electronic form - belonging to their former spouse and handed them over to their legal representatives. The ratio of the decision turns largely on factual issues which in the judgment of all three of the judges entitled the claimant to a full trial. However it is the various and conflicting obiter pronouncements of the court which will cause particular consternation in the minds of family practitioners.

To read the rest of this article, see March [2010] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Financial Remedies Handbook

Financial Remedies Handbook

Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...

Available in Lexis®Library


Law, Practice and Precedents

This work provides commentary, checklists, procedural guides and precedents on the subject in a...