Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

14 AUG 2006

ANCILLARY RELIEF: G v G (Consent Order: Lump Sum: Payment by Instalments) [2006] EWHC 1993 (Fam)

(Family Division; Baron J; 19 June 2006)

Following the Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR) appointment, the FDR judge did not have jurisdiction to have any further involvement in the application for ancillary relief, but once the ancillary relief application had been dealt with by consent, there was no rationale for preventing the FDR judge from dealing with further or new applications that came into being. Having made a consent order, the FDR judge had jurisdiction to deal with consequential directions in relation to that order and/or to vary the terms of that order.

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports

"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas...

More Info from £166.00
Available in Family Law Online

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters