Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

Court of Protection Practice and Procedure Conference 2016

A comprehensive guide to best practice and current thinking

02 NOV 2010

Shared Residence: A Review of Recent Research Evidence - Family Law journal

LIZ TRINDER, Professor, School of Law, Exeter University

There has been a significant rise in the use of shared residence or ‘shared care' over the last decade in England and elsewhere. The aim of this article is to summarise the key messages for practitioners from a wealth of recent research studies on the outcomes of shared residence: it looks at numbers of shared residence arrangements, family profiles, durability, satisfaction and the impact of shared residence on child well being.

At the start it is important to sound a note of caution about the evidence base. There are some very clear and persuasive messages emerging from recent research but there remain large gaps in knowledge. Almost everything we know about shared care is based on overseas research with no large-scale UK studies. Research to date has also been dominated by the views of mothers and fathers although parents are clearly not objective reporters. With a few notable (and small-scale) exceptions we have only a limited understanding of children's experiences of shared care. Studies have also generally failed to distinguish between different types of shared residence families, ‘lumping' together co-operative and litigating families into a single ‘shared care' group. This is a problem as there are very different types of shared residence. As McIntosh and others note ‘Litigating and high conflict families who enter substantially shared care arrangements are different from cooperative parents who self select into shared parenting. They enter on a different track, and stay on that track by different means, with different outcomes' (J McIntosh, B Smyth, M Kelaher, Y Wells and C Long, Post-separation parenting arrangements and developmental outcomes for infants and children (Attorney-General's Department, 2010) at p 104).

Finally, it is important to be aware that the terms ‘shared residence' or ‘shared care' can be used to cover a very broad range of timeshare arrangements. There is very little research just on 50/50 ‘equal time' arrangements. More commonly, researchers define shared care as anything from 30% to 70% of overnights with each parent.

To read the rest of this article, see November [2010] Family Law journal (link for online subscribers who have logged in). To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.


Family Law

Family Law is the leading practitioner journal, ensuring all family law professionals keep up with the latest developments and their impact on practice. Each issue contains the latest news of legislative change, authoritative case reports, invaluable articles and news items written and compiled by experts for the practising family law professional.

Red Book Plus

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

Family Law Online

Family Law Online

Get a FREE trial today! The fastest way to access the latest law reports, case law, commentary,...

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters