Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

Court of Protection Practice and Procedure Conference 2016

A comprehensive guide to best practice and current thinking

08 FEB 2013

FINANCIAL REMEDIES: BP v KP and NI (Financial Remedy Proceedings: Res Judicata) [2012] EWHC 2995 (Fam)

(Family Division, Mostyn J, 26 October 2012)

During financial proceedings the wife claimed the husband and a business associate had fraudulently constructed an agreement which effectively removed the majority of the family assets from the divorce proceedings and that once they were completed the assets would return to the husband.

The husband asserted that the wife was barred from pursuing her claim by the operation of the doctrine of res judicata and that she was barred from running a case of add back in relation to losses suffered by him and, therefore, the family arising from the enforcement of the agreement.

Following the ruling in Henderson v Henderson it could not be argued that the husband would be unjustly harassed if the wife were permitted to put forward her case in financial remedy proceedings.


Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online
Family Law Online

Family Law Online

Get a FREE trial today! The fastest way to access the latest law reports, case law, commentary,...

Available in Family Law Online
Subscribe to our newsletters