All your resources at your fingertips.Learn More
Mark Pawlowski, Professor of Property Law, University of Greenwich. Prior to the landmark Court of Appeal decision in Oxley v Hiscock  EWCA Civ 546,  2 FLR 669, two divergent lines of authority had emerged for determining the quantum of beneficial interest arising under a constructive trust in the context of the family home. At one extreme, the parties equitable entitlement fell to be assessed by means of a strict arithmetical calculation of the parties respective financial contributions towards the acquisition of the property on the basis of a resulting trust; see, Springette v Defoe  2 FLR 388. Alternatively, a broader approach based on a determination of what is fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them relevant to their ownership and occupation of the home (and their sharing of its burdens and advantages) was adopted in Midland Bank plc v Cooke  4 All ER 562 and Drake v Whipp  1 FLR 826. In Oxley, the Court of Appeal accepted this more robust analysis to quantification and rejected the strict resulting trust approach reflected in earlier case-law. See June  Fam Law 462 for the full article.
Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.
This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...