CHILD ABUSE: D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust; MAK v Dewsbury Healthcare NHS Trust; RK v Oldham NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23

27 AUG 2005

(21 April 2005; Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Brown; [2005] The Times April 22, [2005] 2 FLR 284

Healthcare and other child care professionals did not owe a common law duty of care to parents not to make unfounded allegations of child abuse. The child, not the parent, was the doctor's patient, in whose best interests he was obliged to act. Where the doctor's suspicions were aroused, he had to be able to act single-mindedly in the child's interests without regard to the possibility of a claim by the parent. The seriousness of child abuse as a social problem demanded that healthcare and other child care professionals should not be subjected to conflicting duties when deciding whether a child might have been abused and what further steps to take. (Lord Bingham, dissenting, would have allowed the claims to go to trial.)

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports

"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas...

More Info from £166.00
Available in Family Law Online

Family Court Practice 2016, The

(Red Book)

Order your copy today and get the Autumn Supplement

More Info from £465.00
Available in Family Law Online