Agreements and 'Otobo Plus' in Ancillary Relief Law: SEL v AAL

25 APR 2010

MIRANDA FISHER, Partner and JAMES RIBY, Assistant Solicitor, Charles Russell LLP

At the beginning of the last decade the House of Lords decided the landmark case of White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. In the years immediately following the decision in White, the reported cases focused primarily on the application of the principle of equality in ancillary relief law. More recently, the spotlight has moved to agreements, which have now become the focus of reported family law cases. The judgment of Mrs Justice Eleanor King in SEL v AAL [2008] EWHC 3658 (Fam), (unreported) 21 November 2008 is another in this line of cases demonstrating the increasing regard of the family courts for agreements. At the time of writing, the decision of the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, [2009] 2 FLR 1181 on the status of premarital agreements in ancillary relief law is awaited and will mark the beginning of a new decade in English family law.

To read the rest of this article, see May [2010] Family Law journal. To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.

Red Book Plus

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

Family Law Reports

Family Law Reports

"The unrivalled and authoritative source of judicially approved case reports, covering all areas...

More Info from £166.00
Available in Family Law Online