Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

04 JUL 2008

NEGLIGENCE/SEXUAL ABUSE: A (Historic Child Abuse) v Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 783

(Court of Appeal; May, Keene and Smith LJJ; 4 July 2008)

While it was not the case that in every case of abuse the victim must be taken to have known at the time that he had suffered a significant injury, a person who had been raped, whether vaginally or anally, must know that he or she had suffered not only a grave wrong but also a significant injury. Applying the objective test set out in A v Hoare; Young v Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) [2008] UKHL 6, the claimant had therefore known at all times after it occurred that the abuse amounted to a significant injury. He would not have known of his own knowledge whether it was worth bringing an action, but he would at least have known enough to make it reasonable to expect him to consult a solicitor. The limitation period had therefore expired. It was for the court below to consider whether or not to exercise the discretion to disapply the limitation provisions in this case.



Law, Practice and Precedents

This work provides commentary, checklists, procedural guides and precedents on the subject in a...

Financial Remedies Handbook

Financial Remedies Handbook

Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook this is the first resort for thousands of...

Available in Lexis®Library