Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

Court of Protection Practice and Procedure Conference 2016

A comprehensive guide to best practice and current thinking

26 SEP 2013

Child maintenance: how much should the state require fathers to pay when families separate?

Caroline Bryson, Bryson Purdon Social Research
Ira Mark Ellman, Arizona State University
Stephen McKay, University of Lincoln
Joanna Miles, University of Cambridge

Millions of British households are eligible to receive child maintenance from non-resident parents, but fewer than one-third receive payments regularly, and two-thirds receive nothing. Many would not be in poverty if they regularly received the appropriate maintenance payments. The Government nonetheless plans to reduce the state's role in setting amounts and enforcing their payment. This article reports on a comprehensive study of the British public's views on these issues, in which 3,248 randomly chosen members of the British public were asked to state, in pounds, the amount of child maintenance they believed the law should require the father to pay for each of a series of families in different financial and family circumstances. The study found the public believes  (1) the state should set the amount of, and enforce, child maintenance payments; (2) amounts should be considerably higher than currently called for in the CSA formula, especially at higher paternal incomes; (3) fathers should pay a higher percentage of their income in child maintenance when either their income is more, or the mother's income is less, unlike the state formula that applies the same percentage to all fathers without regard to either parent's income; (4) even low-income parents should pay at least some child maintenance; and (5) the purpose of child support goes beyond ensuring the child has necessities, to also provide the child with amenities, when the father's income allows. While there was some variation among population subgroups in the details, these five basic principles were favoured by both men and women, by those with more or less income or education, and without regard to the respondent's self-identified party affiliation.

The full version of this article appears in the October 2013 issue of Family Law.
Family Law Online

Family Law Online

Get a FREE trial today! The fastest way to access the latest law reports, case law, commentary,...

Available in Family Law Online
Red Book Plus

Red Book Plus

Family Court Essential Materials

This ready reference guide for all family court practitioners and judges provides a portable...

Subscribe to our newsletters