Our website is set to allow the use of cookies. For more information and to change settings click here. If you are happy with cookies please click "Continue" or simply continue browsing. Continue.

Family Law

The leading authority on all aspects of family law

03 OCT 2012

SURROGACY:Re D and L (Surrogacy) [2012] EWHC 2631 (Fam)

(Family Division, Baker J, 28 September 2012) 

Male civil partners had twin boys via a surrogacy arrangement with an Indian surrogate through a clinic in India. All parties signed the contract but as per the procedure of the clinic the men were not permitted to meet the surrogate. The woman signed a consent form prior to the birth and the men took over the care of the twins 2 days after their birth. They then returned to the UK. The clinic failed to obtain the requisite consent 6 weeks after the birth from the surrogate and refused to co-operate in order to find her.

The men applied for parental orders. The court directed an investigation into the circumstances but the men were unable to locate the surrogate despite the assistance of an enquiry agent. The court held that the men had taken all reasonable steps to find the surrogate and that it was in the interests of the welfare of the child to make the parental orders. Applicants were advised to ensure clear lines of communication with the surrogate prior to the birth in order to obtain consent once the child was born.

Female Genital Mutilation

Female Genital Mutilation

Law and Practice

Covers the law, practice and procedure in respect of FGM and also includes wider contextual...



Law, Practice and Precedents

This work provides commentary, checklists, procedural guides and precedents on the subject in a...